Structural Properties, Natural Bond Orbital, Theory Functional Calculations (DFT), and Energies for the Two New Halo Organic Compounds
Shahriar Ghammamy1*, NoorAhmad Qaitmas1,2, Amir Lashgari1
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University,
Qazvin, Iran.
2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Faryab University, Faryab, Afghanistan
*Corresponding Author E-mail: Shghamami@yahoo.com; naqaitmas@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Two new compounds formed from with C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH. the combination of these two compounds has not yet made our theoretical section did former is expected to be made in the future In this paper, the optimized geometries and frequencies of the stationary point and the minimum-energy paths are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with 6-311 basis sets. The geometries and normal modes of vibrations obtained from B3LYP/6-311 calculation results indicated that some selected bond length and bond angles values for the C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH. The group point of compounds 1-2 are Cs respectively.
KEYWORDS: Halo organic compounds, Electronic structure, Calculations, Vibrational analysis, B3LYP level.
INTRODUCTION:
Halo organic compounds have many used in theoretical and industrial [1, 2]. Many different data have been found about the structural properties of halo compounds, but they are insufficient and opposing in somewhere. Two new primitive synthesized halo compounds are C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH, which used for structural chemistry studies and organic synthesis [3, 4].
The investigation of the structures and properties of the compound and similarities are interested. The structure has been confirmed by neutron diffraction studies and is justified by VSEPR theory [5-8]. During this study we report the optimized geometries, assignments and electronic structure calculations for the compound. The structure of the compound has been optimized by using the DFT (B3LYP) method with the 6-311 basis sets, using the Gaussian 98 program [9]. Density functional theory methods were employed to determine the optimized structures of C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH. Initial calculations were performed at the DFT level and split- valence plus polarization 3-21G basis sets were used. Local minima were obtained by full geometrical optimization have all positive frequencies [10].
COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS:
All computational are carried out using Gaussian 98 program [11]. We calculated atoms bond length (C-F, C-Br, C-C, C=O, C-F) and second molecule(C-F ,C-C , C-F , C-C ,C-Cl , C=0) by Gaussian software in the C2F2O molecule ,respectively : (1.53 A, 1.97 A, 1.53 A, 1.19 A, 1.37A) and second molecule (1.36 A , 1.52 A , 1.40 A , 1.51 A, 1.19 A, 1.40A) and but atoms bond length according to reference [13] is respectively: (1.379 A ,1.94 A, 1.54 A , 1.22 A ,1.379 A) . The mainly due to atoms is effect electronegativity in the molecule compound (Table 1) and (Table 2). The optimized structural parameters were used in the vibrational frequency calculations at the HF and DFT levels to characterize all stationary points as minima. Harmonic vibrational frequencies (ν) in cm-1 and infrared intensities (int) in Kilometer per mole of all compounds were performed at the same level on the respective fully optimized geometries. Energy minimum molecular geometries were located by minimizing energy, with respect to all geometrical coordinates without imposing any symmetrical constraints.
Table 1-A comparison of the bond length atoms in (1) C2Br2F2O molecule calculated by the Gaussian bond length molecule different atoms in the ordinary mode .
|
Bond length in various molecules |
Bond length calculated by the Gaussian |
||
|
Bond lengths (Å) |
Atoms |
Bond lengths (Å) |
Atoms |
|
1.38 |
C-F |
1.53 |
C2-F4 |
|
1.94 |
C-Br |
1.97 |
C2-Br6 |
|
1.54 |
C-C |
1.53 |
C1-C2 |
|
1.22 |
C=O |
1.19 |
C1=O7 |
Table 2-A comparison of the bond length atoms in (2) C3ClF4OH molecule calculated by the Gaussian bond length molecule different atoms in the ordinary mode.
|
Bond length in various molecules |
Bond length calculated by the Gaussian |
||
|
Bond lengths (Å) |
Atoms |
Bond lengths (Å) |
Atoms |
|
1.38 |
C-F |
1.36 |
C3-F4 |
|
1.54 |
C-C |
1.52 |
C2-C3 |
|
1.38 |
C-F |
1.40 |
C2-F7 |
|
1.54 |
C-C |
1.51 |
C1-C2 |
|
1.76 |
C-Cl |
1.19 |
C1-Cl10 |
|
1.22 |
C=O |
1.40 |
C1=O8 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Molecular properties
The structures of compounds are shown in Figure 1. Geometry optimization shows that symmetry for compounds 1 and 2 are Cs respectively. All calculations were carried out using the computer program GAUSSIAN 98. Theoretical calculation of bond and angle for the compound was determined by optimizing the geometry (Table 3).
NBO Analysis in Table3 and The NBO Calculated Hybridizations are reported in Table3. We could not compare the calculation results given in bond lengths and bond angle values. Because the crystal structure of the title compound is not available till now. B3LYP/6-311 calculation results showed that the (C1-Br6) and (C1-Cl7) bond length values for the C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH in compounds 1-2 are 1.97 Å and 1.88 Å respectively. The group point of compounds 1-2 are Cs respectively.
Table 3- Geometrical parameters optimized for (1) C2Br2F2O, (2) C3ClF4OH some selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (◦).
|
|
Method |
|
B3LYP/6-311 |
|
(2) C3ClF4OH |
|
(1) C2Br2F2O |
|
|
angles (◦) |
Bond lengths (Å) |
angles (◦) |
Bond lengths (Å) |
|
1.51 |
C1-C2 |
1.53 |
C1-C2 |
|
1.36 |
C3-F4 |
1.37 |
C1-F3 |
|
1.36 1.36 1.52 1.09 1.40 1.40 1.91 |
C3-F5 C3-F6 C2-C3 C2-H9 C2-F7 C1-O8 C1-Cl10
|
1.53 1.97 1.37 1.19
|
C2-F4 C2-Br6 C2-F5 C1-O7 |
|
|
Bond angles (◦) |
|
Bond angles (◦) |
|
109.938 |
C2-C1-F8 |
111.706 |
C2-C1-F3 |
|
110.564 |
C2-C1-F9 |
123.957 |
C2-C1-F4 |
|
109.441 109.005 110.617 109.167 107.526 110.002 111.751 129.960 107.581 |
C2-C1-F10 F8-C1-F9 C1-C2-C3 C1-C2-H4 C1-C2-F7 C3-C2-H4 H4-C2-F7 C2-C3-O5 C2-C3-Cl6 |
124.327 108.631 112.734 107.207 109.948 109.074 109.153 |
C2-C1-Br5 F3-C1-F4 C1-C2-F4 C1-C2-Br5 F3-C2-F4 F3-C2-Br5 F4-C2-Br5 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
Figure 1. Optimized geometries of (1) C2Br2F2O, (2) C3ClF4OH at B3LYP/6-311 level of theory.
NBO study on structures
Natural Bond Orbital's (NBOs) are localized few-center orbital's that describe the Lewis-like molecular bonding pattern of electron pairs in optimally compact form. More precisely, NBOs are an orthonormal set of localized "maximum occupancy" orbital's whose leading N/2 members (or N members in the open-shell case) give the most accurate possible Lewis-like description of the total N-electron density. This analysis is carried out by examining all possible interactions between "filled" (donor) Lewis-type NBOs and "empty" (acceptor) non-Lewis NBOs, and estimating their energetic importance by 2nd-order perturbation theory. Since these interactions lead to donation of occupancy from the localized NBOs of the idealized Lewis structure into the empty non-Lewis orbitals (and thus, to departures from the idealized Lewis structure description), they are referred to as "delocalization" corrections to the zeroth-order natural Lewis structure. Natural charges have been computed using natural bond orbital (NBO) module implemented in Gaussian98. The NBO Calculated Hybridizations are significant parameters for our investigation. These quantities are derived from the NBO population analysis. The former provides an orbital picture that is closer to the classical Lewis structure. The NBO analysis involving hybridizations of selected bonds are calculated at B3LYP methods and 6-311 level of theory (Table 4).
These data shows the hyper conjugation of electrons between ligand atoms with central metal atom. These conjugations stand on the base of p-d π-bonding. The NBO calculated hybridization for C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH shows that all of complexes have SPX hybridization and non planar configurations. The total hybridization of these molecules are SPX that confirmed by structural. The amount of bond hybridization showed the in equality between central atoms angles (Table 3) Shown distortion from octahedral and VSEPR structural and confirmed deviation from VSEPR structures.
In C2BrF4O the lone pair located on chlorine atoms and significantly delocalized in the ϭ*-hybrid orbital's of C-F bonds. Indeed, in the interaction energy from the charge transfers of nC1→ ϭ* C-F in the C2BrF4O complex confirms the above point and in the average for C2BrF4O the maximum interaction energy is predicted (Table 5).
Table 4 -The NBO Calculated Hybridizations for (1) C2Br2F2O, (2) C3ClF4OH at the B3LYP/6-311.
|
|
C2Br2F2O |
|
|
(2) C3ClF4OH |
|
|
Bond |
Atom |
B3LYP |
Bond |
Atom |
B3LYP |
|
C-C |
C1-C2 |
S1P2.08 |
C-C |
C1-C2 |
S1P1.99 |
|
C-F |
C2-F6 |
S1P2.86 |
C-F |
C1-F8 |
S1P3.57 |
|
- |
F3 |
S1P99.99 |
- |
F8 |
S1P99.99 |
|
- |
O7 |
S1P1d |
- |
O5 |
S1P99.99 |
|
- |
Br5 |
S1P99.99 |
- |
Cl6 |
S1P99.99 |
Table 5- Second order perturbation theory analysis of Fock matrix in NBO basis for (1) C2Br2F2O, (2) C3ClF4OH. E(2)a means energy of hyper conjugative interaction (stabilization energy); b Energy difference between donor and acceptor i and j NBO orbital's; c F(i, j) is the Fock matrix element between i an j NBO orbital's.
|
Donor (i) |
Type |
ED/e |
Acceptor (j) |
Type |
ED/e |
E(2) a(KJ/mol) |
E(j)‐E(i) b(a.u) |
F(i,j)c (a.u) |
|
C2Br2F2O (1) C1C2 C1F3 F (3) O (7) Br (5) |
σ σ n n n |
1.98887 1.99119 1.92956 1.79180 1.94286 |
C1F3 C1F4 C2O7 C1C2 C1F3 |
σ* σ* σ* σ* σ*
|
1.98983 1.99117 1.99768 1.98887 1.98983
|
0.70 2.05 1.53 24.65 2.26 |
0.91 1.16 0.36 0.55 0.42 |
0.023 0.045 0.021 0.106 0.028 |
|
C3ClF4OH (2) C1C2 C1F8 F (8) O (5) Cl (6) |
σ σ n n n |
1.97964 1.99181 1.93516 1.72110 1.99636 |
C2C3 C1F9 C1C2 C2C3 C3O5 |
σ* σ* σ* σ* σ* |
1.98076 1.99092 1.97964 1.98076 1.99790 |
0.63 2.01 8.82 2.54 4.47 |
1.04 1.18 0.66 1.04 0.81 |
0.023 0.045 0.069 0.047 0.054 |
Frontier molecular orbital
Both the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are the main orbital take part in chemical stability. The HOMO represents the ability to donate an electron, LUMO as an electron acceptor represents the ability to obtain an electron. The HOMO and LUMO energy were calculated by B3LYP/6-311 method [12]. This electronic absorption corresponds to the transition from the ground to the first excited state and is mainly described by one electron excitation from the highest occupied molecular or orbital (LUMO). Therefore, while the energy of the HOMO is directly related to the ionization potential, LUMO energy is directly related to the electron affinity. Energy difference between HOMO and LUMO orbital is called as energy gap that is an important stability for structures. In addition, 3D plots of highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs) are shown in Figure 2. The HOMO–LUMO energies were also calculated at the 3-21G and the values are listed in Figure 2, respectively.
|
E LUMO = -0.07778 a.u |
|
|
|
ΔE = 0.23498 a. |
|
|
|
E HOMO = -0.31276 a.u |
(1) |
|
|
E LUMO = -0.08826 a.u |
|
|
|
ΔE = 0.24115 a.u |
|
|
|
E HOMO = -0.32941 a.u |
(2) |
|
Figure 2. The atomic orbital of the frontier molecular orbital for (1) C2Br2F2O, (2) C3ClF4OH at B3LYP/6-311 level of theory .
CONCLUSION:
In this research we are interested in studying on two new halo organic compounds was chosen to theoretical studies. The combination of these two compounds has not yet made our theoretical section did former is expected to be made in the future. In this paper, the optimized geometries and frequencies of the stationary point and the minimum-energy paths are calculated by using the DFT (B3LYP) methods with 6-311 basis sets. B3LYP/6-311 calculation results indicated that some selected bond length and bond angles values for the C2BrF4O and C3ClF4OH. The group point of compounds 1-2 are Cs respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Imam Khoemieni International University.
REFERENCES:
(1) Ghammamy, Sh., Z. Anvarnia, M. Jafari, K. Mehrani, H. Tavakol, Z. Javanshir, and G. Rezaeibehbahani,. Synthesis and characterization of two new halo complexes of Iodine (C4H9)4N[I2Br]- and (C4H9)4N[I2Cl]- and theoretical calculations of their structures. Main Group Chemistry, 2009 : 8: 299 – 306.
(2) Becke, A. D. Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys.,1993: 98: 5648-5652.
(3) Sundaraganesan, N. and S. Ilakiamani. Dominic Joshua B Vibrational spectroscopy investigation using ab initio and density functional theory analysis on the structure of 3, 4- dimethylbenzaldehyde. Spectrochimica Acta Part A., 2007 : 68: 680-687.
(4) Lewis, D. F. V., C. Ioannides, and D. V. Parke. Interaction of a series of nitriles with the alcohol-inducible isoform of P450: computer analysis of structure-activity relationships. Xenobiotica, 1994 , 24: 401-408.
(5) Ralph, G. Chemical hardness and the electronic chemical potential Inorganic Chimica Acta,1992: , 198: 781-786.
(6) Fleming, I. Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions, Wiley, London,1976 : pp. 125.
(7) Zhang, W., D.P. Curran. Synthetic Application of Fluorous. Tetrahedron, 2006 : 62: 11837– 11865.
(8) Smith, M. C., Y. Ciao, H. Wang and S. J. George. Coucouvanis D, Koutmos M, Sturhahn W, Alp EA, Zhao J, Kramer SP Normal-Mode Analysis of FeCl4- and Fe2S2Cl42- via Vibrational Mossbauer, Resonance Raman, and FT-IR Spectroscopies. Inorg. Chem.,2005 44: 5562-5570.
(9) Vrajmasu, V. V., E. Mu¨nck, and E. L. Bominaar. Theoretical Analysis of the Jahn−Teller Distortions in Tetrathiolato Iron(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chem., 2004 : 43: 4862–4866.
(10) Ghammamy, Sh., K. Mehrani, S. Rostamzadehmansor, and H. Sahebalzamani. Density functional theory studies on the structure, vibrational spectra of three new tetrahalogenoferrate (III) complexes. Natural Science,2011 , 3, 683-688.
(11) Frisch, M. J. Trucks, G. W. GASSIAN 98 (Revision A. 3) Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA , 1998 .
(12) [12] Sudha, S., N. Sundaraganesan, M. Kurt, M. Cinar, M. Karabacak, Molecular structure, vibrational spectroscopic, first order hyperpolarizability and HOMO, LUMO studies of 2-aminobenzimidazole. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2011 : 84: 184-195.
(13) D.N. Singh, basic concepts of inorganic chemistry for competitive examination.
Received on 31.10.2014 Modified on 16.11.2014
Accepted on 05.12.2014 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem 8(1): January 2015; Page 60-65
DOI: 10.5958/0974-4150.2015.00013.9